Presentations

Note: Some of the linked files are large.
Right-click and "save as" if you experience difficulty viewing them in your browser.

Summary of the Co-Chairs

Day 1: Wednesday, October 17, 2007
A Wahner (director FZ Jülich, Tropospheric Institute)		Opening address
A. Zuber, T. Keating (chairs of TF HTAP)		Objectives of the TF HTAP, summary of progress to date, objectives of this workshop
Discussion of results obtained in SR1 and TP1. Chair: Oliver Wild (proposed)
A. Fiore, F. Dentener		Results from model experiment set 1 (source receptor analysis)
Martin Schultz , O. Wild		Results from model experiment set 2 (transport and process studies)
C. Textor, Michael Schulz		Results from aerosol model intercomparisons HTAP and plans of AEROCOM
Analysis of individual models (SR1). Chair: Frank Dentener
Presentations on modelling studies and specific analyses by individual participants
Michael Sanderson , UK Metoffice		Analysis of HTAP NOy deposition
Jan-Eiof Jonson, EMEP, Norway		Analysis of HTAP ozone vertical profiles results
C. Cuvelier		The HemiTap Tool
Tatsuya Nagashima, NIES Japan		Regional and global modeling of tropospheric ozone over Japan
Huisheng Bian, University of Maryland/NASA		Importance of relative humidity for AOT calculations.
Gufran Beig, Inst.Trop. Met, Pune		Long Range transport of pollutants from Asia
SR3 Climate Change Chair: tbd
Climate Change
Magnuz Enghardt, SMI		Regional climate modeling and pollution, Prudence
Carlos Ordonez (CNRS-LA, Toulouse ) or Olaf Stein (MPI-Met./FZ Jülich)		The 2003 heat-wave and pollution
Guang Zeng		SR experiments under future climate modelled by UM_CAM
Ruth Doherty, David Stevenson, Univ. Edinburgh		SR relationships under the 2050 climate
Peter Hess, NCAR		Climate change and HTAP
Holger Tost (MPI Mainz)		Uncertainties in modelling wet deposition.
John van Aardenne		Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts and Response Strategies
Day 2: Thursday, October 18, 2007
HTAP and regional modelling. Chair: Joshua Fu
Bridging the regional and global scales: examples from regional scale models.
Laurence Rouil		Lessons from the Eurodelta regional model intercomparison
Tracey Holloway, University of Wisconsin		Global modeling in MICS Asia
Yang Zhang, North Carolina State University		Modelling from urban/regional to hemispheric scales ( China , Pacific Ocean , and continental US) using various models
Joshua Fu, University of Tennessee		East Asia/China/Beijing regional air quality modeling study by Using CMAQ Modeling System
EURAD group		Modelling of European air quality
Benchmark datasets. Chair David Parrish (Proposed)
Benchmark dataset
Jos de Laat, KNMI, the Netherlands		CO retrieval from Sciamachy
Bart Dils, BIRA Belgium		Long range transport of NO2 using OMI data
Kjetil Torseth		Integration of observational databases for evaluation of Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollutants
Rudy Husar		HTAP NO2 web application Multi-Species Analysis: How consistent are results
David Parrish, NOAA		A test of model transport and mixing:Hydrocarbon ratio relationships
Drew Shindell		Analysis of poleward transport in SR1 and TP1 experiments
Day 3: Friday, October 19, 2007
Planning of experiments SR3/SR4 (2008-2009). Chair: Michael Schulz (proposed)
O. Wild, M. Schultz		Planning of further simulations for experiment set 2 (transport and process studies) Lessons for Experiment Set 4
I. Bey+M. Evans (?)		Planning of set-up for experiment set 3 (field experiments)
Ruth Doherty, Peter Hess, David Stevenson		HTAP and climate change Link to IPCC (tbc)
Joshua Fu, Tracey Holloway		Cooperation Between HTAP and Regional Modeling
Laurens Ganzeveld		Do we need a renewed focus on the dry deposition process?
Keating		Deliverables for 2009 assessment report: possible SR4 experiments
Dentener, Schultz, Wild		Discussion of publication plans
T. Keating, A. Zuber		Wrap-up, next steps of the TFHTAP